Effect of Using Race Evo, EdgeFile X7, and Protaper Gold Rotary File Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Obturated Root Canal (A comparative study)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v19i2.984Keywords:
fracture resistance, rotary instruments, , Race Evo, Protaper Gold, and Edge File X7Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this research was to compare the fracture resistance of obturated roots prepared by using the Race Evo, Edge File X7, and Protaper Gold file systems.
Materials and methods: 60 extracted maxillary first molars were selected, their coronal portions were removed and their working length was calculated. The samples were separated into three experimental groups according to the used NiTi rotary systems and one control group; each group contains 15 samples. Group one remained uninstrumented (control), Groups 2-4 were instrumented by the Race Evo (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), Edge File X7(Edge Endo; Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States), and Protaper Gold file systems (Dentsply, Maillefer, Switzerland) respectively. After instrumentation, the experimental groups were filled using a single-cone technique. The sealer was mixed according to manufacturing instructions with master Gutta-Percha cones of size 40 (0.04 taper, (Diadent Group International, Korea) for Race Evo and Edge file X7, and size 40 taper 0.06 for the Protaper Gold file system (Dentsply, Maillefer, Switzerland). To set the sealer, the specimens were kept at 37 °C and 100% humidity for two weeks. The root fracture stress was measured in Newtons using Instron universal testing equipment.
Results: One Way ANOVA test showed there was a significant difference in the mean value of the fracture resistance between the four groups (P < 0.05). The LSD test was used for the comparison of the multiple groups so the control group showed the highest fracture resistance among groups (p < 0.05). among the experimental groups, the roots prepared by Race Evo showed the highest fracture resistance (p < 0.05), while roots prepared by Protaper Gold and Edge file x7 showed the lowest fracture resistance with a statistically significant difference (p > 0.05)
References
AbdelWahed A. Comparative assessment of apically extruded debris using Protaper Next, Hyflex CM and EdgeFile X7 nickel titanium instruments (An in vitro Study). Egyptian Dental Journal. 2021 Oct 1;67(4):3751-7.
Adorno CG, Yoshioka T, Suda H. The effect of root preparation technique and instrumentation length on the development of apical root cracks. Journal of endodontics. 2009 Mar 1;35(3):389-92.
Aidasani GL, Mulay S, Borkar A. Comparative evaluation of flexural fracture resistance of mandibular premolars after instrumentation with four different endodontic file systems: An In Vitro study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2020 Sep 1;31(5):701.
Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, et al. The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod 2009;35:236–8
Bürklein S, Tsotsis P and Schafer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod. 2013; 39(4):501- 04.
Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Uysal B. Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin. Journal of endodontics. 2014 Sep 1;40(9):1482-4.
Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, and controlled memory wire J Endod. 2015;41:535–8
De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Souza EM, Silva EJ, de Almeida Neves A, Alves H, Lopes RT, Versiani MA. Micro–computed tomographic assessment on the effect of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive systems on dentinal cracks. Journal of endodontics. 2015 Jul 1;41(7):1116-9.
Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties. ProTaper Gold Brochure. 2014.
EdgeEndo. EdgeFile X7 directions for use. Available at: https://edgeendo.com/wp
FKG Dentaire. The XP-endo Shaper Brochure. Available at:http://www.fkg.ch/sites/default/files/201612_fkg_XPS_brochure_v3_en_web .pdf.
Galal M, Hamdy TM. Evaluation of stress distribution in nickel-titanium rotary instruments with different geometrical designs subjected to bending and torsional load: A finite element study. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2020 Dec;44(1):1-1.
Gambarini G, Galli M, Seracchiani M, Di Nardo D, Versiani MA, Piasecki L, Testarelli L. In vivo evaluation of operative torque generated by two nickel-titanium rotary instruments during root canal preparation. European Journal of Dentistry. 2019 Oct;13(04):556-62.
Ha JH, Kwak SW, Sigurdsson A, Chang SW, Kim SK, Kim HC. Stress generation during pecking motion of rotary nickel-titanium instruments with different pecking depth. Journal of endodontics. 2017 Oct 1;43(10):1688-91.
Hassan SA, Gholam MK. Fracture resistance of posterior occlusal veneers fabricated from different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing materials (an in vitro study). International Medical Journal. 2020;25(1).
Hülsmann M, Peters O, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals. shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics 2005;10:30 –76.
Khdairah HR, Al-Gharrawi HA. The effect of canal preparation using 2shape, protaper gold and protaper next file systems on the fracture resistance of obturated roots. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2020;13(1):42-5.
Kim TO, Cheung GSP, Lee JM, Kim BM, Hur B, Kim HC (2009a) Stress distribution of three NiTi rotary files under bending and torsional conditions using a mathematic analysis. Int Endod J 42:14–21
Kwak SW, Shen Y, Liu H, Kim HC, Haapasalo M. Torque generation of the endodontic instruments: A narrative review. Materials. 2022 Jan 17;15(2):664.
Liu R, Hou BX, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, Shemesh H. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system. Journal of endodontics. 2013 Aug 1;39(8):1054-6.
Li UM, Lee BS, Shih CT, Lan WH, Lin CP. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests. Journal of endodontics. 2002 Jun 1;28(6):448-51.
Mohammed YT, Al-Zaka IM. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated with different root canal sealers (a comparative study). J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 May 1;21(5):490-3.
Mohan GM, Basheer SA. Assessment of fracture resistance of teeth instrumented by different file system. Inter J Appl Dent Sci. 2018;4(2):233-6.
Nur BG, Ok E, Altunsoy M, Tanriver M, Capar ID. Fracture strength of roots instrumented with three different single file systems in curved root canals. European journal of dentistry. 2015 Apr;9(02):189-93.
Omran AN, Alhashimi RA. The effect of ah plus and guttaflow bioseal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots instrumented with reciprocal rotary systems. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2019;8(2):102-8.
Pawar AM, Pawar MG, Thakur B, Banga K S,Luke AM. Resistance to fracture of teeth instrumented using novel EndoStar E5 rotary versus ProTaper Next and WaveOne file systems. Conserv Dent. 2018; (21):52- 6.
Pereira ÉSJ, Viana ACD, Buono VTL, Peters OA, de Azevedo Bahia MG. Behavior of nickel-titanium instruments manufactured with different thermal treatments. J Endod. 2015;41(1):67–71
Peters OA, Morgental RD, Schulze KA, Paqué F, Kopper PM, Vier‐Pelisser FV. Determining cutting efficiency of nickel‐titanium coronal flaring instruments used in lateral action. International endodontic journal. 2014 Jun;47(6):505-13.
PradeepKumar A.R., Shemesh H., Archana D., Versiani M.A., Sousa-Neto M.D., Leoni G.B., Silva-Sousa Y.T.C., Kishen A. Root canal preparation does not induce dentinal microcracks in vivo. J. Endod. 2019;45:1258–1264.
Rundquist BD, Versluis A. How does canal taper affect root stresses? Int Endod J. 2006; 39: 226–237.
Shemesh H, Roeleveld AC, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. Damage to root dentin during retreatment procedures. Journal of endodontics. 2011 Jan 1;37(1):63-6.
Shi L, Zhou J, Wan J, Yang Y. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and WaveOne Gold nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2022 Jan 1;17(1):430-7.
Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2010;36:609-17.
Zupanc J, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys—a review. Int Endod J. 2018;51(10):1088–103
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
