Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris with Protaper Gold, Reciproc Blue and Hyflex CM Instruments.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v17i1.1016Keywords:
Apically Extruded Debris, Protaper Gold, Reciproic Blue and HyflexAbstract
Aim of study: The target of the present investigation was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris with three endodontic nickel -titanium instruments; ProTaper Gold, Reciproc Blue and Hyflex CM .
Materials and Methods: 30 mandibular premolars were separated into three groups according to the instrumentation methods (n=10) for every system, Protaper Gold, Reciproc Blue and Hyflex CM. After change of each file 5ml of 2.5% NaOCl was used as an irrigating solution with a 30G side vented irrigating needle, the apically extruded debris was collected in pre weighed glass vials, the samples were takeout and incubated at 68Co for 5 days to remove the liquid. The tubes were measured again, and the contrast between the first and last weight was calculated to determine the weight of the debris. The data were statistically analysed using One-way ANOVA analyses followed by Post hoc Tukey LSD test.
Result: Data obtained were statistically analyzed using One Way ANOVA and Post hoc Tukey LSD tests. All groups showed apical debris extrusion, The ProTaper Gold systems extruded more debris in comparison with other groups(0.0421)g, also the Protaper Gold group and Hyflex CM system showed statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
Conclusions: All experimental groups produced apically extruded debris .The Protaper Gold group associated with greater apically extruded debris than other groups. While the Hyflex CM group showed the least amount of apical extrusion
References
Friedman S, Mor C. The success of endodontic therapy--healing and functionality. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32(6):493–503.
Gambarini G, Di Nardo D, Miccoli G, Guerra F, Di Giorgio R, Di Giorgio G, et al. The Influence of a New Clinical Motion for Endodontic Instruments on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain. Clin Ter 2017; 168(1):e23–e27.
Siqueira JF Jr. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J 2003; 36(7):453–63.
Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, et al. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002; 28(6):457–60.
- Duque, Jussaro Alves, et al. “Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems.” Journal of Applied Oral Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2017, pp. 27-33.
Yared, Ghassan. “Reciproc blue: the new generation of reciprocation.” DOAJ, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2017, pp. 96-101.
-Ninan E, Berzins DW (2013) Torsion and bending properties of shape memory and superelastic nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 39(1): 101-104.
Shalan, Linz A., Hussain F. Al-huwaizi, and Abdalbseet A. Fatalla. “Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants after using different irrigation needles and systems with different depth of penetration, a comparative study.”BPJ, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2018, pp. 519-23.
Boijink, Daiana, et al. “Apically extruded debris in curved root canals using the waveone gold reciprocating and twisted file adaptive systems.”JOE, 2018.
Boijink, Daiana, et al. “Apically extruded debris in curved root canals using the waveone gold reciprocating and twisted file adaptive systems.” JOE 2018.
Zan, Recai, et al. “Apical extrusion of intracanal biofilm after root canal preparation using Revo-S, Twisted File Adaptive, One Shape New Generation, ProTaper Next, and K3XF instrumentation systems.” TEJ Vol. 1, No. 2, 2016, pp. 73-79.
Hadi, Ali W., and Mohammed R. Hameed. “Comparative Study of the amount of apically extrusion of debris during root canal preparation using wave One™, Trushape 3D™, Hyflex™ CM and One Shape™ instrumentation systems, an in vitro study.” JBCD, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2017, pp. 1-8.
Al-Hashimi, Majida K., and Zaid K. Al-Doory. “The influence of instrument application frequency on the apical extrusion of debris using rotary ProTaper, hand ProTaper and hybrid technique: An in vitro study).” JBCD , Vol. 24, No. 4, 2012, pp. 34-39.
Siqueira JF Jr, Roças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod 2008; 34: 1291-301.
Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology Int Endod J 2006;39 (12):931-30.
Kamizar, Ricardo S, Nursasongko B. Comparison of Apical Third Cleanliness of Smear Layer Using Endoactivator® and Vibringe®. J Int Dent Med Res 2016; 9 (3) 211-214
Somayaji K, Shobha KL, Ballal V, Amy NN, Gupta L. Quantification of Lipot eichoic Acid of Gram Positive Bacteria after Irrigation with Sodium Hypochlorite in Root Canal-An in vitro Study. J Int Dent Med Res 2017; 10 (2) 233-238
Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006; 32:389-98.
Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod 1985; 11: 472-478.
Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Favieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JCM, Abad EC. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on an antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002; 28: 457-60. DOI:
Siqueira J. Microbial causes of endodontic flare‐ups. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 453-463.
Kocak MM, Cicek E, Kocak S, Sağlam BC, Yılmaz N. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems. Int Endod J 2015; 48(3):283–6.
De-Deus G, Neves A, Silva EJ, Mendonca TA, Lourenco C, Calixto C, et al. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary system. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19(2):357–61.
Mohammed, N, et al. “Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study.” J COP Vol. 17, No. 11, 2016, pp. 939-42.
Luisi, Simone Bonato, et al. “Apical extrusion of debris after hand, engine-driven reciprocating and continuous preparation.” Revista Odonto Ciência, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2010, pp. 288-91.
I.-S. Jeon, L. S. W. Sp˚angberg, T.-C. Yoon, R. B. Kazemi, and K.-Y. Kum, “Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 96, no. 5, pp.
–607, 2003.
De-Deus G, Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Elias CN, Plotino G, Grande NM. Blue thermomechanical treatment optimizes fatigue resistance and flexibility of the Reciproc files. J Endod 2017; 43: 462-426.
Nevares, Giselle, et al. “Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment using protaper next and reciproc in severely curved canals IEJ, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2017,
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
