Validity of Hounsfield Units in Skyview Cone Beam Computed Tomography to detect bone densities at different jaw sites during implant insertion

Authors

  • Dr. Amal R.S. Mohammed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v13i1.820

Keywords:

Hounsfield Unit, jaw, bone density, cone beam computed tomography

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bone densities by Hounsfield Unit at jaw sites in sky view cone beam computed tomography and to compare these values to the optimal bone densities proposed in the literature.

Materials and Methods: Thirty-six patients, 15 males and 21 females were assessed; CT data for different jaw sections and regions were compared using (t-test).

Results: The means of bone density in all regions are higher in male than female. The mean bone density in the anterior mandible is higher ; the mean bone densities in the four jaw regions decreased in the following order in female or male or general ( anterior mandible > anterior maxilla > posterior mandible > posterior maxilla ) .

Conclusion: The bone densities assessed by HU fell into the range of optimal bone densities proposed in the literature.

 

 

 

References

- Jaffin RA. and Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone : A 5 year analysis. J of Periodontology 1991; 62(1): 2-4.

- Herrmann I., Lekholm U., Holm S. & Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2005 ; 20: 220-230.

- Schwartz MS. , Rothman SLG. , Rhodes ML. , Chaftez N. Computed tomography : part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987 a ; 2: 137-141.

- Schwartz MS., Rothman SLG. , Rhodes ML. Computed tomography: part II. Preoperative assessment of the maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987 b ; 2:143-148.

- Smith JP. and Borrow JW. Reformatted CT Imaging for Implant Planning. Oral Maxillofac Surgery Clin of North Am 1991 ; 3: 805-825.

- Ito K. , Yoshinuma N. , Goke E. , Arai Y. , Shinoda K. Clinical Application of a New Compact Computed Tomography System for Evaluating the Outcome of Regenerative Therapy: A Case Report. J Periodontol 2001 ; 72: 696-702.

- Aranyarachkul P. , Caruso J. , Gantes B. , Schulz E. , Riggs M. , Dus I. , Yamada J. , Crigger M. Bone Density Assessment of Dental Implant Sites: Quantitative Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005 ; 20: 416-424.

- Scarfe WC. , Farman AG. , and Sukovic P. “Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice,”. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 2006 ; 72 (1) : 75–80 .

- Shapurian T. , Damoulis P. , Reiser G. , Griffin T. , Rand W. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006 ; 21: 290-297.

- Norton MR. and Gamble C. Bone classification: An objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001 ; 12: 79-84.

- Misch CE. and Kircos LT. Diagnostic imaging and techniques. In Misch CE (Ed.). Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby ; 1999. P. 73-87.

- Choi JH. , Park CH. , Yi SW. , Lim HJ. , Hwang HS. Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontics miniscrew implants . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009 ; 136 (6) :766 . el-12. (IVSL) .

- Merheb J.,Van Assche N.,Coucke W., Jacobs R., Naert I., and Quirynen M. “Relationship between cortical bone thickness or computerized tomography-derived bone density values and implant stability,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 2010 ; 21 (6) : 612–617.

- Borges MS. and Mucha JN. Bone density assessment for mini-implants position . Dental Press J Orthod 2010 ; 15(6):58.e1-9.

- Hiasa K. , Abe Y. , Okazaki Y., Nogami K. , Mizumachi W., and Akagawa Y. Preoperative Computed Tomography-Derived Bone Densities in Hounsfield Units at Implant Sites Acquired Primary Stability. ISRN Dentistry 2011 ; P. 5.

- de Oliveira RC. , Leles CR. , Normanha LM. , Lindh C., and Ribeiro-Rotta RF. “Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images,” Oral Surgery, OralMedicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology 2008 ; 105(2) :231-238.

- Fuh LJ. , Huang HL. , Chen CS. et al. “Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2010; 37(5): 346-351.

- Turkyilmaz I. , Ozan O. ,Yilmaz B. , Ersoy AE. Determination of Bone Quality of 372 Implant Recipient Sites Using Hounsfield Unit from Computerized Tomography: A Clinical Study . Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2008 ; 10 (4) : 238–244

Downloads

Published

06.02.2019

How to Cite

Mohammed, D. A. R. (2019). Validity of Hounsfield Units in Skyview Cone Beam Computed Tomography to detect bone densities at different jaw sites during implant insertion. Mustansiria Dental Journal, 13(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v13i1.820

Issue

Section

Oral Medicine & Oral Surgery

Categories