Comparison the marginal and internal fitness of veneered and anatomical zirconia crowns milled by two different CAD/CAM systems (An in Vitro Study)

Authors

  • Abdul Kareem Jasim kahdim Prof. Dr at Al-Turath University College, Dentistry Department

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v18i2.926

Keywords:

Internal fitness, Zirconia, CAD/CAM

Abstract

Background: Accuracy of fit is considered a very important factor in a crown fabricating procedure. Zirconium oxide ceramic is gaining popularity because of its remarkable mechanical capabilities and the potential aesthetic results obtained by using its recommended veneering porcelain, this study aimed to determine the effect of porcelain veneering on the marginal and internal fitness of zirconium-oxide crowns milled with two different CAD/CAM systems ( Wet and dry milling).

Materials and methods: An ideal prepared tooth #16 to receive an all-ceramic crown restoration with 0.8mm chamfer finishing line was used as a master die. It duplicated and poured to get thirty-two stone working dies. The stone dies divided into two major groups according to the CAD/CAM systems being used, then each group subdivided into two subgroups (n=8) either zirconia crowns milled to full contour or traditional veneered zirconia crowns. Each crown then cemented to it stone die and sectioned longitudinally into four pieces.      Stereomicroscope with aid of (image J) was used to examine the sample at a magnification of (140X). Four points of measurement were selected at each of the four-sectioned parts.

Results: The final internal gap value of each sample was the arithmetical mean of the selected points of the four-sectioned pieces The data was evaluated statistically, using One-way ANOVA and LSD tests which revealed highly significant differences (p<0.001) among groups.

Conclusion: Full-contoured zirconia crowns have better marginal and internal fit than the traditionally veneered crown, (CEREC AC, Sirona) system showed the best internal fitness. The mean gap of all groups was within the clinically acceptance.

References

Tan L, Gratton G, Diaz-Arnold M, Holmes C. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2008; 17(5):378-83.

Liu PR. A Panorama of Dental CAD/CAM Restorative Systems. Compedium Conti Educ Dent. 2005; 26: 507-513.

Denry IL, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dental Materials. 2008; 24: 299- 307.

Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J. 2011; 56 (1): 97-106.

Marchack BW, Futatsuki Y, Marchack CB, White SN. Customization of milled zirconia copings for all-ceramic crowns: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99: 169-173.

Thaleia V, Spiridon K, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in Dentistry: Part I. Discovering the nature of an upcoming bioceramic. The European Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2009; 2: 2-23.

Fernanado Z, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: Clinical and experimental considerations. Dental Materials. 2011; 27: 83-96.

Aboushelib MN, Dozic A, Liem JK. Influence of framework color and layering technique on the final color of zirconia veneered restorations. Quintessence Int .2010; 41:84-9.

Wolfart S, Martin S, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all–ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 6: 587–592.

Francine E, Omar M. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of procera all ceramic crowns with four cements. J Pros. Dent. 2004; 17: 529–535.

Garcia AJ, Santana FB, Szalay ER. Marginal adaptation and microleakage comparison between two zirconia oxide systems with the same cement. J Revista Odontologica. 2011; 15 (2): 101-106.

Rossetti PHO, Valle AL, Carvalho RM, Goes MF, Pegoraro LF. Correlation between margin fit and microleakage in complete crowns cemented with three luting agents. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008; 16(1):64-9.

Ece Yüksel, Ali Zaimoğlu. Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25(3):261-6.

Beuer F, Schweiger J. Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Brit Dent J. 2008; 204:505-11.

Filser F, Kocher P, Weibel F, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). Int J Comput Dent. 2001; 4: 89-106.

Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 283-291.

Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J oral sci. 2005; 113:174-79.

Atta A, Sabea N. Comparison of marginal adaptation, internal fitness and microleakage of Zolid, Zirconia and Empress 2 all-ceramic crown materials. Mustansiriya Dental J. 2013; 10(2):1-6.

Bindl A, Mormann W. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehab. 2005; 32:441-47.

Downloads

Published

28.12.2022

How to Cite

Jasim kahdim, A. K. . (2022). Comparison the marginal and internal fitness of veneered and anatomical zirconia crowns milled by two different CAD/CAM systems (An in Vitro Study). Mustansiria Dental Journal, 18(2), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v18i2.926