The Effect Of Surface Disinfections Of Gutta-Percha On Shear Bond Strength Of Three Root Canal Sealers

Authors

  • Nibras khalil Ibrahim College of Dentistry, University of Mosul
  • Zena Mohammad younis College of Dentistry, University of Mosul
  • Nawal A. AL_sabawii College of Dentistry, University of Mosul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v18i1.907

Keywords:

Gutta percha (gp), disinfection, sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine,, Root canal sealers. Shear bond strength (S.B.S)

Abstract

Aim: The purpose was to study the influence of disinfectant solutions on shear bond strength between gutta percha (GP) and different sealers.

Materials and method: 90 GP samples were used. Glassionemer sealer group A (n=20), mineral trioxide aggregate( MTA) sealer group B (n=20), iroot sealer group C (n=20), control group (n=10) for each group. Treated the surface of GP for each group by two disinfectant solutions (NaOCL 2.5%,  CHX 2%).Shear bond strength( S.B.S) test was calculate by digital universal testing machine.

Results: iroot sealer (group C) with NaOCL solutions at (2.5%) increase shear bond which were significantly different P≤0.05 from CHX at (2%) and fresh control cones. glassionemer sealer (group A) gaive the lowest measured.

Conclusions:  NaOCL solutions at 2.5% left a many pitting investigated on the GP surface. Thus it increased the bond with sealer. The quality of the surface texture and mechanical properties of GP were unaffected by a CHX solution of 2%. Therefore, they were considering as the safe disinfectant solutions for GP cones. 

References

References

-Kayaoglu G, Gurel M, Omurlu H, Gonca Z, Sadiak B. Examination of gutta-percha cones for microbial contamination during clinical use. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17(2): 244-247.

-Osvaldo L, Pereira S, Jose F, Siqueira JR. Contamination of gutta-percha and resilon cone taken directly from manufacturer. Clin Oral Invest. 2009;10:1007-1009.

-Taha MY, Al-Sabawi NA, Shehab EY. Rapid decontamination of gutta percha cone using different chemical agents. Al-Rafid Dent J. 2010;1: 30-37.

-Gomes Bp, Vianna ME, Matsumoto CU, Rossin UP, Zaia AA, Fi lho FJ. Disinfection of guttapercha cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100:512.

-Redmerski R, Bulla JR, Morena T, Garcia LB, Cardosa CL. Disinfection of gutta-percha cones with chlorhexidine. Braz J Microb. 2007; 38:649-655.

-Pang NS, Jung IY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY. Effects of short–term chemical disinfection of guttapercha cones: identification of affected microbes and alterations in surface texture and physical properties. J Endod. 2007; 33: 594-598.

-Zamany AA. Do sodium hypochlorite solutions affect gutta-percha cones. J Endod. 2006;34:567-569.

-Valois CRA, Silva LP, Azevedo RB. Effect of 2% chlorhexidine and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite on gutta-percha cones studied by atomic microscopy.

Int Endod J. 2005;38:425-429.

-Valois CRA, Sliva LP, Azevedo RB. Structural effects of sodium hypochlorite solution on guttapercha cones: atomic force microscopy study. J Endod. 2005; 31:749-751.

- Short RD, Dorn SO, Kuttler S. The crystallization of sodium hypochlorite on gutta percha cone after the rapid-sterilization technique: an SEM study. J Endod. 2003; 29:630-633.

- Hsieb KH, Liao KH, Lai EH, Lee BS, Lee CY, Lin CP. A noval polyurenthane-based root canalobturation material and urethane acrylate- based root canal sealer-Part I: synthesis and evaluation of mechanical and thermal properties. J Endod. 2008; 34:303-305.

- 12-Williams C, Loushine RJ, Weller N, Pashley DH, Tay FR. A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of resilon and gutta percha . Int Endod J. 2006; 32: 553-555.

- 13-Suh KS, Moon TJ, Lee CR, Hah JH, Noh JS. Mechanical properties of highly loaded gutta percha/ZnO composite.Polymer(Korea). 1993;2:168-175.

Downloads

Published

16.10.2022

How to Cite

khalil Ibrahim, N. ., Mohammad younis, Z. ., & A. AL_sabawii, N. . . (2022). The Effect Of Surface Disinfections Of Gutta-Percha On Shear Bond Strength Of Three Root Canal Sealers. Mustansiria Dental Journal, 18(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v18i1.907

Most read articles by the same author(s)