Evaluation of wet vs. dry dentinal adhesion by using scanning electron microscope

Authors

  • Ahmed T. Hieawy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v1i1.1084

Keywords:

Dentinal adhesive material, resin-dentin interface, scanning electron microscope

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the resin -dentin interface of the Excite bonding system applied to wet and dry dentin by using scanning electron microscope. The adhesive and the composite were applied according ot the manufacturer instruction to a standardized buccal and palatal class V cavities prepared on human upper first premolar. The teeth were sectioned vertically ot examine the resin dentin interface, several morphological differences were seen between wet and dry technique, the hybrid layer analysis revealed different hybridization patterns, suggesting that the attachment seems ot be influenced by many factors and a standardization of dentinal substrate si impossible.

References

References 1. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherl G: Microscopy Investigation, Technique, Results, Limitations. Am J Dent 2000; 13:3-18. Arbazadhe F, Gage JP, Young WG, Shahabi S, Swenson SM: Gap measurement and bond strength of five selected adhesive systems bonded to tooth structure. Aus D J 1998; 43(3):175-180. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B , Sano H, Homer JA: Permeability of dentin to adhesive resins. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 618-631. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrecht P, Vanherle G , Duk ES, Eick JD, Robenson SJ: ATEM study Evaluation of wet vs. dry.. of two water based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 1998; 56: 50-59. 5. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Wurst M, Duschner H, DÖrfer: The nanoleakage phenomenon: Influence of moist vs. dry bonding. J Adhes Dent 1998; 4: 23-30. 6. Goodis HE, Marshall GW, White JM: The effect of storage after extraction of the teeth on human dentin permeability ni vitro. Arch Oral Bio 1 998; 36: 561- 566. Dörfer CE, Staehel HJ, wurst MW. Duschner H, Pioh :T The nanoleakage phenomenon: influence of different dentin bonding agents thermocycling and etching time. Eur I 108: 346-351. oral Sci 1998; 8. Pioch T, Kobaslija S, Schagen B, Gotz H: Interfacial micromorphology and Tensile bond strength of dentin bonding systems after NaOCI treatment. J Adhesive Dent 2000; :2 135-142. Mustansiria DJ Vol.:1 No.: 1 2004 46 9. Pioch T, Kobaslija S, Husseinbegovi A, Muler K, Dörfer CE: The effect of NaOCI Dentin treatment on nanoleakage formation. J Bio Mater Res 2001; 56 (4): 578-83. 10. Nakajima M, Kanemura N, Pereira PNR, Tagami ,J Pashiey DH: Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 324-328. 11. Santini A, Plasscbaert A, Mitcbell :S Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Chapter 6 Doctoral dissertation Univ of Nijmegen 2000; 69-82. 12. Santini A, Mitcbell S: Effect of wet and bonding techniques o n marginal leakage. Chapter 3Doctoral dissertation. Univ of Nijmegen 2000;

Downloads

Published

15.06.2004

How to Cite

T. Hieawy, A. (2004). Evaluation of wet vs. dry dentinal adhesion by using scanning electron microscope. Mustansiria Dental Journal, 1(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v1i1.1084