The microhardness measurement and polarized light microscopic evaluation for enamel surface after debonding of brackets using different orthodontic adhesive materials (A comparative in vitro study)

Authors

  • Saad A AL-Mashhadany
  • Nidhal H.Ghaib
  • Ahlam H. Majeed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v1i2.1119

Keywords:

Microhardness, enamel surface, orthodontic adhesive material, polarized light microscope, morphology of enamel surface

Abstract

This study was carried out to compare the effects of different orthodontic adhesive materials on the micro-hardness of human enamel surface with different incubation period and ot evaluate the morphology of enamel surface before and after orthodontic treatment using polarized light microscope. The sample includes one hundred twenty sound maxillary arid mandibular first premolar teeth which have been extracted for orthodontic treatment purpose from (13- 19) years old patients. The samples were divided into one as a control group and three experimental groups (lIl.Ill) according to the type of the orthodontic adhesive materials Reliance orthodontic products No-Mix. Advantage No-Mix. Orthodontic bonding system No-Mix) respectively. Each group consists of 03 samples and each group subdivided into three subgroups (10 sample) according ot the time of incubation 2( weeks,4 weeks and 8 weeks) and each subgroup divided to (5 upper, 5 lower). The study showed that enamel decalcification was associated with fixed orthodontic appliance thereby and the hardness of enamel si highest with group I (orthodontic bonding system No-Mix) folowed by group 1(Reliance orthodontic products) and group I (Advantage No-Mix). The study indicate that there was non significant difference between group I (Advantage No-Mix and group I (Orthodontic bonding system No-Mix) after 2 and 4 weeks period times bonding ni reduction of micro hardness values in both upper and lower teeth-while there si high significant difference between them ni micro hardness values after 8weks period times bonding ni both upper and lower teeth. The result of polarized light microscope finding show destruction of the perikymata of enamel during 2 weeks period time and increased ni destruction during 4 weeks period time but during 8 weeks period time there is remineralization only ni group 1 fOrthodontic bonding system No-Mix)

References

- Mizrahi E: Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatment. Am J orthod Dento face orthop 1982; 82:62-7. -2 Mitchell :L Orthodontic bonding adhesives, Br Jorthod 1994: 21: 79-82. -3 Ogaard B: Prevalence of white spot lesions ni 19-years olds: Astudy on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J orthou Dento fac orthop 1989; 96:423-7. Krogstad O: -4 Scheie A A. Amesoury P. Effect of orthodontic on prevalence of streptococcus mutans in plaque and saliva. Seand I Dent Res 1984; 92.211-7. -5 Darling A I: Studies of the carly carious lesion of enamel with transmitted light, polarized light and microradiography. Br D e n t : 101: 289-297. Modes of three orthodontic adhesive. / clin Orthod 1956; 27:207-209.1993. 6- Welbury, R R Paediatris dentistry. Oxford medical publication, hc 6, 1996. 7 - Arends, .J Ten Bosch J :J Inde-and remineralization of dental enamel. In: leach SAs ed Factors 10 relatin g demineralization and remineralization of 14- Wan Leung S: Saliva and dental caries. Dent. Clinic North mA 1965; 347-355. 15-Alexander C,J Viazis AD. Nakajima H: Bond strength and fracture 1985. 16- Vor Fraunhofer JA, Alien DJ: Thermal effects associated with ND. YAG Dental laser. Taken from angel No 4; 1993, 29. 17-Craig R. O and Ward, M L: Restorative dental material. 10ht Ed, hc 1997,10 p 244-57. teeth. Oxford: IRI oress 1986 p 11-1. 8- Ogaard B R a n d Ten Boesh J J T: Regression of white spot enamel lesions. A new topical method-tor quantitative longitudinal evaluation ni vivo. Am J orthod Deto facial orthop, 1994 06: 238- 42 9- Cacciafesta. Subenberger V. Jos!- Brinkman PG, Methke, RR: Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded with different light - cured glass ionorner cements; as ni vitro study. Eur J othod 1998; 20: 177-87. 10-Swartz M :L Ceramic Brackets. J Clin Orthod; 22:82-8. Wincheslor L J Direct orthodontic bonding ot porcelain, an ni vitro study. Be I Orthod 1991; 18: 38-229 11-Salentjen L 1985: Dental and oral tissue, an introduction, 2nd ED 1985 Chapter 254-229. 12-Kashket, 5 and Ahren J M: Correlation between physical changes ni teeth enamel and changes in iodide permeability following j V i t r o intra oral demineralization. Caries Res 1989 23: 232-237. 13-Koulourides T. Remincralization of enamel and dentin. Dent Clin orth Am 497-485 July. 23-Hodge H C, Mackay H: The microhardness of teeth JADA. 1933; 20:227-223. 24-Miake K. Higashi S, Fukuyama :T Microharuness studies on human teeth 1996; No 8:Dept of histology. Tokyo Dental Collage. 25-Gorelick, L, Geiger, A M. Gvvinnett, A. Incidence o f white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982; 81:93-98. 26-Hats 5, Hata I-L'Omata 5-Honda K- Mavanar H-Validannn hardness measurement of dental hard tissues using tactile sensation Vitro study pediatric dentel jornal 2000; 10:149.154. 27- Forsten, :L Curing depth of visible light activated composites. acta odontal scand 1984; 42:23-8. 28- Samuel SMW: Microhardness of the enamel restored with fluoride and non fluoride releasing dental materials. Braz Dent I 2000;12 (I): 35-38. (Internet). 196 18-Swartz ML: Ceramic brackets. / Clin Orthod 1985; 22:83-8. JD: 19-Paster LC, Moreno JV. Carrido Comparing the tensile strength of the brackets adhered to laser etched enamel VS. acid etched ename,l JADA, 197; 128:732-737. 20-Gelhard. Ten C a t e JM: Rehardening of enamel lesions ni Vivo, caries Res 1979:83-13:80. 21-Kardos S, shi B, sipos T: The ni Vitro demineralization potential o f a sodium fluoride, calcium and phosphate oin- containing dentifrice u n d e r v a r i o u s experimental condition. J din Dent 1999; 10.22-25. 22-Craig RO, Peyton FA: The microhardness foenamel and dentin, JDR, 1958; 37:661

Downloads

Published

15.12.2004

How to Cite

A AL-Mashhadany, S. ., H.Ghaib, N., & H. Majeed , A. (2004). The microhardness measurement and polarized light microscopic evaluation for enamel surface after debonding of brackets using different orthodontic adhesive materials (A comparative in vitro study). Mustansiria Dental Journal, 1(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v1i2.1119