Effectiveness of fiberglass glass bur, ultrasonic and manual mechanotherapy on grade II furcation involved mandibular molars (An in vivo comparative study)

Authors

  • Dr. Ban Karem Hassan
  • Dr. Ghasaq A. Abdulwahab
  • Dr. Banaz Jabbar Ali
  • Dr. Raed Aziz Badiea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v12i1.838

Keywords:

Furcation, Fiberglass , Ultrasonic, mechanotherapy, mandibular molars.

Abstract

Background: Access to the molars furcation areas is especially difficult for the patient and clinician alike due to the posterior location of molars, the dimension and position of furcation entrances, and the internal furcation surfaces that are frequently concave or irregularly contoured. The disparity between the size of commonly used scaling instruments and the size of the furcation entrance further complicates the situation.

Materials and Methods: Thirty grade II furcation involved first and second mandibular molar  teeth from seventeen  patients. The clinical parameters that were measured included, Plaque index PI, Gingival index GI, Bleeding on probing BOP, Probing pocket depth PPD and Relative attachment level RAL. The furcation involved teeth included in the study were allocated in 3 groups according to the type mechanical treatment used. GROUP A (GA) :10 teeth treated by hand instrumentation by gracey curette. GROUP B (GB): 10 teeth treated by fiberglass rotary burs. GROUP C (GC)  : 10 teeth treated by ultrasonic scaler with special furcation tip. The clinical parameters were recorded at day (0) (baseline visit,) prior to surgical operations and repeated at (4 weeks), and (12 weeks) after operations. Results:  GROUP A, GB, and GC at (12 weeks) were respectively as the following: PLI (1.28,  1.03  and  0.56), GI (0.97,  1.12 and  0.60), BOP (37.88 %,  39.44 % and  11.66 %), PPD (3.11 mm, 2.8 mm and 1.28 mm) and RAL (3.36 mm,  3.47 mm and 2.7 mm).

Conclusions: GROUP C Ultrasonic scaler revealed the highly significant reduction in the clinical parameters.  Followed by fiberglass burs and lastly by the curette. Also the three groups showed a highly significant reduction in all parameters as the time interval progressed (4 weeks), and (12 weeks).

 

 

References

- Johnson R James, KV Arun, Avaneendra Talwar, T. S. S. Kumar Mathematical analysis of furcation angle in extracted mandibular molars. 2013.(17): (1):68-71

- Deepti Khanna, Sumit Malhotra, D Venugopal Naidu; Treatment of grade II furcation involvement using resorbable guided tissue regeneration membrane: A six-month study 2012:(16):3.404-410.

- Miranda LA, Gomes SC, Soares IJ, Oppermann RV. A resin-modified glass ionomer cement barrier for treating degree II furcation defects: a pilot study in dogs. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006 Feb; 64(1):37-41.

- Neoman MG., H.H.Takei, F.A.Carranza :Carranza's clinical periodontology; Saunders , 11th edition. 2012; pp: 482-490

- Reddy S. : Essentials of clinical Periodontics and Periodontology.; 2011.

- McFall W. Tooth loss in 100 treated patients with periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1982;53:539-49.

- Takacs VJ, Lie T, Perala DG, Adams DF. Efficacy of 5 machining instruments in scaling of molar furcations. J Periodontol. 1993;64(3):228-36.

- Fleischer HC, Mellonig JT, Brayer WK, Gray JL, Barnett JD. Scaling and root planing efficacy in multirooted teeth. J Periodontol. 1989;60(7):402-9.

- Kalkwarf KL, Kaldahl WB, Patil KD. Evaluation of furcation region response to periodontal therapy. J Periodontol. 1988;59(12):794-804.

- (Foteini V. Derdilopoulou , Jörg Nonhoff1,Konrad Neumann , Andrej M. Kielbassa Microbiological findings after periodontal therapy using curettes, Er:YAG laser, sonic, and ultrasonic scalers Journal of Clinical Periodontology Volume 34, Issue 7, pages 588–598, July 2007).

- Evian CI, Horowitz RA, Dwayne K, Maltz DO (1998) Evaluation of a surgical debridement bur for use in periodontal surgery. Compend Contin Educ Dent 19, 1124-1132.

- Ellman IA (1962) Rotary ultrasonics for preventive periodontics. NY State Dent J 28, 404-410.

- David LC, Kenneth LK, Michel AB (1994) Plaque and calculus removal. considerations for the professional. Quintessence Publishing, Chicago, 69-72.

- Tarik Y. Khamrco ,Raed A. Badea , Jamal A. Mehd .Evaluation of the effectiveness of newly designed motor-driven fiberglass burs versus hand instrumentation in open root planing. Mustansiria DJ. 2006 Vol.:3 No.:2 pp 3-9.

- Sangeeta Singh, Subrata Roy,1 and S. K. Chumber2 Evaluation of two local drug delivery systems as adjuncts to mechanotherapy as compared to mechanotherapy alone in management of chronic periodontitis: A clinical, microbiological, and molecular studY; J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2009 Sep-Dec; 13(3): 126–132.

- Pushpendra Kumar Verma, Ruchi Srivastava, Anju Gautam, TP Chaturvedi .Multiple regenerative techniques for class II furcation defect:European Journal of General Dentistry, 2012, Volume 1, Issue 2 [p. 90-93]

- (Pavan Bajaj1 , A. R. Pradeep1,*, ,Esha Agarwal1, ,Nishanth S. Rao1, ,Savitha B. Naik2, ,,N. Priyanka1, Nitish Kalra1 Comparative evaluation of autologous platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of mandibular degree II furcation defects: a randomized controlled clinical trial 14 JAN 2013)

- Hou GL, Hung CC, Yang YH, Tsai CC, Chen PH, Shieh TY. Topographic study of extracted molars with advanced furcation involvement: Furcation entrance dimension and molar type. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2003;19:68-74

- Novaes AB Jr, Palioto DB, de Andrade PF, Marchesan JT. Regeneration of Class II Furcation Defects: Determinants of Increased Success. Braz Dent J 2005;16:87-97.

- Sculean, A., Schwarz, F., Berakdar, M., Romanos, G., Brecx, M., Willershausen, B., & Becker, J. (2004). Non-surgical periodontal treatment with a new ultrasonic device (Vector-ultrasonic system) or hand instruments. Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 31(6), 428-433.

- ( Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egeiberg J:-Effect of non surgical periodontal therapy I . Moderately advanced periodontitis. J Clin periodontol 1981;3: 57-72.

- Copulos TA, low SB , Walker CB, Trebilcock YY, Hefti AF.: Comparative analysis between a modified ultrasonic tip and hand instruments on clinical parameters of periodontal disease.J periodontal 1993; 64: 694-700.

- Ismail MN: Comparative analysis between perio- probe tips of piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and hand curette on clinical parameters of periodontal disease .Msc thesis , Dental college, University of Baghdad 2000.

- (Chatterjee A. ,C.S Baiju, Bose S .etal. Hand Vs Ultrasonic Instrumentation: A Review. Journal of dental science & oral rehabilitation , Oct- Dec 2012.).

- Neoman MG., H.H.Takei, F.A.Carranza :Carranza's clinical periodontology; Saunders , 11th edition. 2015; pp: 482-490

- Linda E. Leon and Richard I. Vogel. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Hand Scaling and Ultrasonic Debridement in Furcations as Evaluated by Differential Dark-Field MicroscopyJournal of Periodontology [1987, 58(2):86-94]

- Bower RC . Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation entrance architecture J Periodontol. 1979 Jan;50(1):23-7;

- Chatterjee A. ,C.S Baiju, Bose S .etal. Hand Vs Ultrasonic Instrumentation: A Review. Journal of dental science & oral rehabilitation , Oct- Dec 2012.

Downloads

Published

11.02.2019

How to Cite

Hassan, D. B. K., Abdulwahab, D. G. A., Ali, D. B. J., & Badiea, D. R. A. (2019). Effectiveness of fiberglass glass bur, ultrasonic and manual mechanotherapy on grade II furcation involved mandibular molars (An in vivo comparative study). Mustansiria Dental Journal, 12(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v12i1.838

Issue

Section

Periodontics Dentistry

Categories