Body and local factors affecting eruption of third molar tooth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v12i1.834Keywords:
BMI, Body mass indexAbstract
Aim : The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of some local and body factors with third molar eruption and may cause delay eruption or impaction which represents one of most important problem in dental clinic.
Method: 150 dental students volunteers participated in this study from both genders and aged between 18-27 years old. A clinical oral examination, body parameters measurements in addition to past dental history were used to assess certain parameters.
Results and conclusions: among all the investigated body and local factors ; only age and body height were significantly affected the eruption of third molar tooth (P<0.05).
References
- Profit WR, Fields HW.Contemporary orthodontics, 3ed ed, Mosby Inc.2000,p:55.
- Wise GE, Frazior-Boners, D'souza RN.Cellular, molecular and genetic determinants of tooth eruption. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2002; 13:323-34.
- Ades AG, Jonndeph DR, Litle RM,Chapko MK. A long –term study of the relationship of third molars to changes in the mandibular dental arch. Am J Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.1990;97(4):323-35.
- Kah IB, Gerlach KL, Hilgers, RD. Along-term ,follow up ,radiographic evaluation of a symptomatic impacted third molars in orthodontically treated patients. Int.H.Oral and Maxillofac. Surg. 1994;23(5):379-85.
- Juodzbalys G , Daugda P(2013). Mandibular third molar impaction review of literature and proposal of a classification. J Oral Dental Research.2013;4:1
- AbuAlhaijaes, Al Bhairan HM, Alkhateeb SN. Mandibular third molar impaction; review of literature and proposal of a classification.2011,P:60.
- Akadiri OA, Obiechina AE, Arotiba JT, Fasola AO. Impact of patient characteristics and radiographic variables on the difficulty removing impacted mandibular third molars. Br Dent. S.2008; 175(3):102-5.
- Edwards MJ, Brickley MR, Grody RD, Shepherd JP. The cost effectiveness and cosr effectiveness of removal and retention of a symptomatic ,disease free third molars.Br. Dent. J.1999; 187(7):380-4.
- Capali J Jr. Mandibular growth and third molar impaction in extraction cases. Angle Orhod,1991; 61(3):223-9.
- Bishara SE, Treder JE, Damon P, Olsen M. Changes in the dental arches and dentation between 25 and 45 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66(6):417-22.
- Sadeghianrizi A, Forsbery CM, Marcus C, Dahllo FG. Craniofacial development in obese adolescent. Eur. J. Orthod. 2005; 27(6):550-5.
- Babtunde OA. Analysis of body mass index, mandibular, and dental alveolar arch factors in prediction of mandibular third molar impaction: A pilot study. J Contemporary dental practice.2010;11(6):1-10
- Jernval J, Thesleff I. Return of lost structure in the developmental control of tooth shape. In:Teaford MF, Smith MM, Ferguson MW of teeth. New York: Cambridge University Press.2000;13-21
- Curran AC, Damm DD, Drummud JF. Pathologically significant pericoronal lesions in adult histopathologic evaluation. J.Oral Maxillofec. Surg.2002; 60(6):613-7.
- Bulter PM(2000). The evaluation of tooth shape and tooth function primates. In: Teaford MF, Smith MM, Ferguson MW of teeth. New York: Cambridge University Press.2000;201-11.
- Berg T. Inability to work after surgical removal of mandibular third molars.1997; Acta . Odontol. Scand.;55(1):64-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
