Effectiveness of Continuous Irrigating Solution on the Microhardness of Root Dentin

Authors

  • Huda Wakas Iraqi ministry of health
  • Iman M. Al-Zaka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v21i2.953

Keywords:

irrigation solution, microhardness, Triton, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, chitosan nanoparticles

Abstract

Background: This in vitro study compared and evaluated the effects of various irrigation solutions on the root canal dentin's microhardness, including Triton, 0.5% chitosan nanoparticles (CNP), and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).

Materials and Methods: Forty extracted mandibular premolars were selected; the samples were decorated to establish 14 mm root length. Each sample was instrumented by using ProTaper Next rotary file X4 (40/0.06). After instrumentation, based on irrigation solution, the samples were randomly split into four groups (n = 10). Group I(Triton), group II (0.5% CNP), group III:(17% EDTA), and group IV:( distal water). The samples were rinsed by Triton throughout instrumentation with Triton and final irrigation for 1.5 min by 1 ml of Triton, CNP, EDTA, and distal water were rinsed with final irrigation by 5 ml of 0.5% CNP, 17% EDTA and distal water for 3 minutes respectively. The samples were longitudinally sectioned and examined under a Vickers microhardness test in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. The mean of these three-thirds was used to determine the microhardness of each sample. ANOVA test was used for statistical evaluation.

Results: There was a significant difference (p≤ 0.05) between all evaluated irrigating solutions, Triton demonstrated the lowest mean of reducing the microhardness compared to the other irrigation solutions followed by CNP and EDTA which had the highest mean of decreasing the root dentin's microhardness.

Conclusions: Compared to the other irrigation solutions examined in this study, Triton had less of an impact on microhardness. EDTA demonstrated the highest effect on root dentin microhardness compared to the other irrigation solutions.

References

1. Silva PV, Guedes DF, Nakadi FV, Pécora JD, Cruz-Filho AM. Chitosan: A new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Int Endod J 2013;46:332-8.

2. Violich, D. R., and N. P. Chandler. "The smear layer in endodontics–a review." International endodontic journal 43.1 (2010): 2-15.

3. Rath PP, Yiu CKY, Matinlinna JP, Kishen A, Neelakantan P. The effects of sequential and continuous chelation on dentin. Dent Mater. 2020;36(12):1655–65.

4. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J. 2014 Mar;216(6):299-303.

5. Attur, Kailash, et al. "Comparative analysis of endodontic smear layer removal efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 7% maleic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study." Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry 6.Suppl 2 (2016): S160.

6. Spanó JCE, Silva RG, Guedes DFC, Sousa-Neto MD, Estrela C, Pécora JD. Atomic absorption spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of concentration of calcium ions and smear layer removal with root canal chelators. J Endod 2009; 35:727-30.

7. Zhou H, Li Q, Wei L, Huang S, Zhao S. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with chitosan and MTAD. Niger J Clin Pract 2018; 21:76-80.

8. del Carpio-Perochena, A., Bramante, C. M., Duarte, M. A. H., de Moura, M. R., Aouada, F. A., & Kishen, A. (2015). Chelating and antibacterial properties of chitosan nanoparticles on dentin. Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 40(3), 195-201.‏

9. Hülsmann M. Effects of mechanical instrumentation and chemical irrigation on the root canal dentin and surrounding tissues. Endod Topics. 2013; 29:55–86.

10. Aranda-Garcia AJ, Kuga MC, Chavéz-Andrade GM, Kalatzis-Sousa NG, Hungaro Duarte MA, Faria G, Reis Só MV, Faria NB Jr. Effect of final irrigation protocols on microhardness and erosion of root canal dentin. Microsc Res Tech. 2013; 76:1079–1083.

11. Zou L, Shen Y, Li W, Haapasalo M. Penetration of sodium hypochlorite into dentin. J Endod. 2010; 36:793–796.

12. Ratih, Diatri Nari, et al. "Time-dependent effect of chitosan nanoparticles as final irrigation on the apical sealing ability and push-out bond strength of root canal obturation." International Journal of Dentistry 2020 (2020).‏

13. Brasseler https://shop.brasselerusa.com/Catalog/Endodontics/Endo Solutions/5028425U0 2020.

14. Arun DR, Sujatha V, Mahalaxmi S. Effect of 5% Carbohydrate Derived-Fulvic Acid on Smear Layer Removal and Root Dentin Microhardness - An In Vitro study. Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):156-160.

15. Bangun, Hakim, Steven Tandiono, and Anayanti Arianto. "Preparation and evaluation of chitosan-tripolyphosphate nanoparticles suspension as an antibacterial agent." Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 8.12 (2018): 147-156.‏

16. Hussein ER, S Shukri BM, Ibrahim RH. The effect of chitosan nanoparticle, citric acid, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on dentin smear layer using two different irrigation needles: A scanning electron microscope study. J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jul-Aug;25(4):431-435.

17. Shi L, Wan J, Yang Y, Yao Y, Yang R, Xie W. Evolution of the combined effect of different irrigation solutions and activation techniques on the removal of smear layer and dentin microhardness in oval-shaped root canal - An in-vitro study. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022 Jul 25.

18. Caron G, Nham K, Bronnec F, Machtou P. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals. J Endod 2010;36(8):1361–6.

19. Poggio, Claudio, et al. "Evaluation of Vickers hardness and depth of cure of six composite resins photo-activated with different polymerization modes." Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD 15.3 (2012): 237.‏

20. Quteifani, Morgana, et al. "A comparative ex-vivo study of effects of different irrigation protocols with/without laser activation on the root dentine’s micro-hardness." Eur Endod J 4.3 (2019): 127-32.‏

21. Tsenova-Ilieva, Irina, and Emilia Karova. "Effect of endodontic irrigants on root dentin microhardness: a systematic review." matrix 15.16 (2020): 17.‏

22. Reis C, De-Deus G, Leal F, Azevedo E, Coutinho-Filho T, Paciornik S. Strong effect on dentin after the use of high concentrations of citric acid: an assessment with co-site optical microscopy and ESEM. Dent Mater. 2008 Dec;24(12):1608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.027. Epub 2008 May 19.

23. Vallabhaneni, Krishna, et al. "Comparative analyses of smear layer removal using four different irrigant solutions in the primary root canals–a scanning electron microscopic study." Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR 11.4 (2017): ZC64.‏

24. Dhawan R, Gupta A, Dhillon JS, Dhawan S, Sharma T, Batra D. Effect of different irrigating solutions with surfactants on the microhardness and smear layer removal of root canal dentin: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;22(5):454-458.

25. Berastegui E, Molinos E, Ortega J. Comparison of standard and new chelating solutions in endodontics J Dent Sci. 2017;2:1–8.

26. Antunes P, Flamini L, Chaves J, Silva R, Cruz Filho A. Comparative effects of final canal irrigation with chitosan and EDTA. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2020; 28.

27. Ari H, Erdemir A. Effects of endodontic irrigation solutions on mineral content of root canal dentin using ICP-AES technique. J Endod. 2005;31:187–189.

28. Panighi M, G’Sell C. Influence of calcium concentration on the dentin wettability by an adhesive. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:1081–9.

29. Zhang J, Xia W, Liu P, Cheng Q, Tahirou T, Gu W, et al. Chitosan modification and pharmaceutical/biomedical applications. Mar Drugs. 2010;8:1962–87.

Downloads

Published

30.12.2025

How to Cite

Effectiveness of Continuous Irrigating Solution on the Microhardness of Root Dentin. (2025). Mustansiria Dental Journal, 21(2), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.32828/mdj.v21i2.953

Similar Articles

41-50 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.