Anatomical Root Variation in The Permanent Mandibular Canine of Iraqi People Using CBCT: A preliminary study

Authors

  • Othman Alani university of anbar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32828/6gbfcc23

Keywords:

mandibular canine with second root, two canals in single-rooted canines, CBCT, mandibular canines

Abstract

Introduction: The knowledge of the root canal morphology helpful in the RCT that end with successful therapy resulted from proper mechanical and chemical debridement then filling the root canals. Missing a canal without cleaning and shaping leading to failure of the treatment because of the persistent infection caused by the remaining microorganisms within the canal that effect on the outcomes.

Aim of this study: The evaluation of foundation of 2nd root in lower canine or one root with two canals mandibular canine by using CBCT.   

Material and methods:A 316 patients come to our clinic (Baghdad smile clinics, Baghdad, Iraq) for different treatment modalities, after taking CBCT image retrieved to analyze the morphology of permanent mandibular canine for each side , the data that collected with exclusion of the missing of any other side of canine, incomplete root formation, root canal treated tooth, tooth with periapical pathology and any internal or external tooth resorption.

Results:32 of 632 cases (5%) showed two rooted mandibular canines. The bilateral examination shows 8 cases only has bilateral mandibular canines with two roots while the others shown in the left side only. Variable root canal configuration shows in 36 cases (5.6%).

Conclusions:Depending on the CBCT examination , the majority of cases have single root with single canal. All two rooted mandibular canine showed in female and most of them in left side. One root with two canals in lower canine showed in female more than male.

 

References

References

1. Vertucci, F. J. (2005). Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic topics, 10(1), 3-29.‏

2. Peikoff, M. D., & Trott, J. R. (1977). An endodontic failure caused by an unusual anatomical anomaly. Journal of endodontics, 3(9), 356-359.‏

3. Neelakantan, P., Subbarao, C., & Subbarao, C. V. (2010). Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium–enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. Journal of endodontics, 36(9), 1547-1551.‏

4. Weine, F. S., Healey, H. J., Gerstein, H., & Evanson, L. (1969). Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 28(3), 419-425.‏

5. Vertucci, F. J. (1984). Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, 58(5), 589-599.‏

6. Gulabivala, K., Aung, T. H., Alavi, A., & Ng, Y. L. (2001). Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. International endodontic journal, 34(5), 359-370.‏

7. Pineda, F., & Kuttler, Y. (1972). Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 33(1), 101-110.‏

8. Ouellet, R. (1995). Mandibular permanent cuspids with two roots. Journal (Canadian Dental Association), 61(2), 159-161.‏

9. Cleghorn, B. M., Christie, W. H., & Dong, C. C. S. (2008). Anomalous mandibular premolars: a mandibular first premolar with three roots and a mandibular second premolar with a C‐shaped canal system. International endodontic journal, 41(11), 1005-1014.‏

10. Somalinga Amardeep, N., Raghu, S., & Natanasabapathy, V. (2014). Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary and mandibular canines in Indian population using cone beam computed tomography. Anatomy research international, 2014(1), 731859.‏

11. Versiani, M. A., Pécora, J. D., & Sousa‐Neto, M. D. D. (2013). Microcomputed tomography analysis of the root canal morphology of single‐rooted mandibular canines. International Endodontic Journal, 46(9), 800-807.‏

12. Aminsobhani, M., Sadegh, M., Meraji, N., Razmi, H., & Kharazifard, M. J. (2013). Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in an Iranian population by cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 10(4), 358.‏

13. Green, D. (1973). Double canals in single roots. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 35(5), 689-696.‏

14. Pécora, J. D., Neto, S., & Saquy, P. C. (1993). Internal anatomy, direction and number of roots and size of human mandibular canines. Brazilian dental journal, 4(1), 53-57.‏

15. You-Nong, W., & Bao-Li, Y. (1995). Morphology research of 1976 permanent root canal. J Pract Stomatol, 11(2), 98-101.‏

16. Zhao, Y., Dong, Y. T., Wang, X. Y., Wang, Z. H., Li, G., Liu, M. Q., & Fu, K. Y. (2014). Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of root canal configuration of 4 674 mandibular anterior teeth. Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban= Journal of Peking University. Health Sciences, 46(1), 95-99.‏

17. Mirzaie, M., & Zaban, P. T. (2012). Cone-beam computed tomography study of root canals in a Hamadani population in Iran. Avicenna Journal of Dental Research, 4(2), 93-99.‏

18. Singh, S., & Pawar, M. (2016). Root and canal morphology of mandibular incisors and canines in South Asian Indian population by canal staining and tooth clearing technique. Endodontology, 28(2), 148-153.‏

19. Yang, Z., Lu, K., Wang, F., Li, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2016). Cone-beam computed tomography study of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent anterior teeth in a Chongqing population (vol 12, pg 19, 2016). THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 12, 387-387.‏

20. Soleymani, A., Namaryan, N., Moudi, E., & Gholinia, A. (2017). Root canal morphology of mandibular canine in an Iranian population: a CBCT assessment. Iranian endodontic journal, 12(1), 78.‏

21. Grover, C., & Shetty, N. (2012). Methods to study root canal morphology: A review. Endodontic practice today, 6(3).‏

22. Cleghorn, B. M., Christie, W. H., & Dong, C. C. (2006). Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. Journal of endodontics, 32(9), 813-821.‏

23. Plotino, G., Grande, N. M., Pecci, R., Bedini, R., Pameijer, C. H., & Somma, F. (2006). Three-dimensional imaging using microcomputed tomography for studying tooth macromorphology. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 137(11), 1555-1561.‏

24. Patel, S., Dawood, A., Ford, T. P., & Whaites, E. (2007). The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. International endodontic journal, 40(10), 818-830.‏

25. Vertucci, F. J. (2005). Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic topics, 10(1), 3-29.‏

26. Al-Dahman, Y., Alqedairi, A., Alfawaz, H., Alnassar, F., & Al-Jebaly, A. (2019). Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of mandibular canines in a Saudi subpopulation. Saudi Endodontic Journal, 9(2), 113-118.‏

27. Piskórz, M., Futyma-Gąbka, K., & Różyło-Kalinowska, I. (2023). Prevalence of two-rooted and one-rooted mandibular canines with two root canals in Poland, assessed using CBCT: A preliminary study. Dental and Medical Problems, 60(2), 233-238.‏

28. . Khan, N. B., Azhar, M., Abbasi, N., & Mehmood, B. (2021). Frequency Of Two Roots In Permanent Mandibular Canine Of Pakistani Population: A Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (Cbct) Study. Journal of University Medical & Dental College, 12(1), 71-75.‏

Downloads

Published

30.06.2025

How to Cite

Anatomical Root Variation in The Permanent Mandibular Canine of Iraqi People Using CBCT: A preliminary study. (2025). Mustansiria Dental Journal, 21(1), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.32828/6gbfcc23

Similar Articles

1-10 of 189

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.